Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loot the dog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Loot the dog
Neologism, World of Warcraft term. Does EVERY term used in an online RPG deserve it's own page? Wildthing61476 03:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as World of Warcruft. (I needed an excuse to pull that out; seriously though, non-notable neologism.) Crystallina 03:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete 22 unique Google hits (although, interestingly, it has 1270 hits total - it's used a lot at one or two sites) seem to indicate that it's not even notable on the Internet. Definite neologism. -Elmer Clark 04:31, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously. VegaDark 04:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per nom.  --Dennette 11:00, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Warcruft. --User:Arnzy (talk • contribs) 12:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Do not Delete Wildthing61476, obviously not every term needs it's own page, but this one is extremely common, and most likely should be kept 19:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.213.230.28 (talk • contribs) — 151.213.230.28 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete it, and then yell "Loot the dog!" wikipediatrix 00:32, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This isnt even a neologism. It actually means what the phrase implies.  And it isnt remotely close to being notable, even though it is a common phrase in WoW. Resolute 02:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.