Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lopača (river)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:G5. Just Chilling (talk) 22:48, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Lopača (river)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article created by Yahadzija sock in violation of global ban and thus unambiguously eligible for speedy deletion (CSD G5). An editor has contested speedy deletion because the article "seems to meet notability criteria (sic)". Even if true--and I would argue it does not--notability is not relevant to CSD G5; content created by banned users, notable and non-notable alike, is subject to deletion per Banning policy and Blocking policy. The underlying philosophical premise is WP:DENY, not notability, and more long-term damage is done allowing banned users (especially Yahadzija) to trickle in content (especially non-notable minor tributaries) in this manner. Note also that prevention of enforcement of a global ban is explicitly disallowed and sanctionable by the WMF. Эlcobbola talk 19:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 20:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as obvious G5. No major edits by users that are not banned. --MrClog (talk) 20:38, 16 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.