Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loralee Larios


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 15:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Loralee Larios

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The only potentially distinguishing characteristic of this early career academic is an Ecological Society of America Early Career Fellowship, which, honestly, ain't anything very remarkable. The rest of her work shows busy engagement with research and teaching but nothing that would satisfy WP:PROF. I don't see a sufficient notability basis here. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. See https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=VylkhkQAAAAJ LeapTorchGear (talk) 00:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. LeapTorchGear (talk) 00:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. LeapTorchGear (talk) 00:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. LeapTorchGear (talk) 00:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks a fair bit WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF notability for this 2013 PhD and current assistant professor.  There are a couple of moderately cited papers, but they are also highly coauthored, and middle author (in a field where that matters) on these doesn't convince me of so much.  The awards are strictly early career.  Little other sign of notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 09:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. A case of  WP:TOOSOON since he neither passes NPROF or GNG. The awards are early career and the papers dont have the sustained impact in the field yet, see Russ. --hroest 12:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly WP:TOO SOON. She has made a good start to her career, and in 5 years of so will probably be an appropriate person to include, just not yet. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. This page, basically a CV, was created by a SPA. Timing is consistent with a tenure app. 128.252.210.4 (talk) 21:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - regretfully - this is a classic TOOSOON situation, as a "early career fellow." Bearian (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.