Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Derby Cup 2023–2024


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ Geschichte (talk) 22:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Lord Derby Cup 2023–2024

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Poorly made article, minimally referenced, out of date, inconsistent format with previous seasons on the topic. Mn1548 (talk) 11:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 19.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 12:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and France. Shellwood (talk) 12:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep – can be reformatted to match similar articles, highest level cup competition in France so should be notable enough and sources are available – I will have a go at improving it. EdwardUK (talk) 12:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thankyou, that looks miles better. My only issue now is that this is the only season of the Lord Derby Cup with an article. Mn1548 (talk) 12:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * It should be possible to create articles for some other seasons. Treize Mondial covers as far as the 2017–18 season, so that would provide enough sources for three more excluding the cancelled years. For earlier seasons it would be more difficult, but the FFRXIII website has news going back to the final in 2012. This can be used to provide some information and is helpful for knowing what to look for in other independent sources – the French Wikipedia articles are of no help for providing sources, but could also be used to suggest what to search for. EdwardUK (talk) 15:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)


 * New opinion Thanks to EdwardUK I think there are sufficient sources to keep the article. In addition to his work reformatting the article. Mn1548 (talk) 13:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.