Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Francis Llonsdale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete per CSD:G3. I consider adding deliberate nonsense hoaxes to be vandalism. This was part of a walled garden. Stifle (talk) 20:14, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Lord Francis Llonsdale

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Yet another lame hoax from regular "alleged troll" (must AGF). Since "hoax" isn't a speedy criteria, wasting everyone's time bringing it here. —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  18:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete as hoax. There should really be a hoax listing in WP:CSD, it would get a lot of hoaxes deleted faster.  NA SC AR Fan 24 (radio me!) 18:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The discussion's been had many times; consensus has always been that one or two admins aren't enough to be sure it's a hoax & not just something they've never heard of, and taking it to AfD gives people a chance to prove it exists —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  19:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.