Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Ghantakarna Mahavir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Lord Ghantakarna Mahavir

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No sources provided, looks to be original research done by someone with a COI. Cannot find sources. Karl 334  ☞ TALK to ME ☜  19:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see any COI issues here (and that's not a reason for deletion). There are no sources, but that's just a cause of not so good article writing. A Google Books search demonstrates that sources are available--all the article needs is an editor who is able and willing to get to work. Drmies (talk) 19:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 15:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep as per Drmies. Enough sources indicating notability are available. Edward321 (talk) 14:00, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep but remove honorific Lord. Enough sources -- Redtigerxyz Talk 17:13, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with Redtigerxyz. I have some sources.--Indian Chronicles (talk) 17:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Please be forgiving of editors whose first language is not english. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:07, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.