Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Leycester Hotel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Ya  sh  !   04:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Lord Leycester Hotel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article does not in any way make clear how the hotel is notable. Improvement tags have been on it for over a year and no action has been taken. I am unable to find any notability elsewhere online and so I do not feel this hotel meets the notability requirements. Oddbodz  - (  Talk  ) (  Contribs  ) 16:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, there are many sources, but none are reliable. Most are from travel reviews and social networks. PikachuRP25 16:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. It sounds quite notable, having stopped an ancient fire.  It is a historic site, a Grade II listed building.  Shouldn't there be official documents relating to its listing, available as sources, although likely not online.  (And if it were not a historic building, then merging to List of hotels or a subpage, or to some other suitable target, would be superior to deleting it.)  We should look for alternatives to deletion, and not just tear stuff down. -- do  ncr  am  16:09, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. More documentation, online and off-line, may be available for this under its alternate and previous names. Try:
 * and
 * and
 * and
 * Yeah, those start to turn up sources like this one, covering history of Three Tuns Inn. -- do ncr  am  16:15, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, those start to turn up sources like this one, covering history of Three Tuns Inn. -- do ncr  am  16:15, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The building will outlast us all. It still is a reliable firebreak.68.40.122.133 (talk) 08:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane 2007  talk 00:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Per WP:GEOFEAT, heritage-listed buildings are notable. In this case, there are two listed buildings: . -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:28, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep -- It is probably indeed NN as a hotel, but is nevertheless notable as a building and hisotricallly, even though only grade II. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.