Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Nog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy/Snow delete. Malinaccier (talk) 22:50, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Lord Nog

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable Star Wars fan fiction character. Disputed PROD. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Fan fiction should be allowed as long as the page provides a disclaimer letting people know that it is fan fiction. Lord Nog (talk) 04:48, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- ( X!  ·  talk )  · @234  · 04:37, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * CSD - clearly vanity nonsense. --EEMIV (talk) 04:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Very strong delete. Fan fiction is subject to the same rules as other articles. This one clearly fails: all original research, no independent reliable sources, no shred of notability. —C.Fred (talk) 04:58, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This belongs on star wars wiki, not wikipedia. Fuzbaby (talk) 05:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Ick. Delete. Speedy. Crafty (talk) 05:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. If he is a character in "unspecified Star Wars fan fiction", how is anyone supposed to know what stories to find him in? And it would seem to be very hard for a character who appears only in fan fiction to achieve notability anyway. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow delete and close this; AfD's busy enough without being cluttered by cases this obvious.— S Marshall  Talk / Cont  08:16, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Obvious delete per WP:MADEUP. • Anakin (talk) 16:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V and WP:RS, i.e. as it gets no hits on Google News and Google Books. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 22:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.