Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord angral


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Lord angral

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable Star Wars character. Not quite a speedy, but it is cruft (which I say as a Star Wars fan). Belongs at Wookiepedia, not here. Tyrenon (talk) 19:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * delete And there's already a nice page for him over at Wookieepedia. PacificBoy  09:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm also a Star Wars fan, but he's a minor character that appears only in one book. A good article on him already exists on Wookiepedia. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Strongest possible keep Non-notable Stars Wars character is the biggest oxymoron I've ever heard. But seriously, isn't there somewhere we can merge this bit? It would be a pity to lose a sith lord... ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:14, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sith, and make sure to add a mention. It looks like he's going to be the Big Bad of Star Wars: The Old Republic, but there's nothing here to merge yet.  Powers T 12:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no notability asserted. Mere appearance in one series does not automatically mean notability. J I P  | Talk 15:57, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.