Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loren Coleman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Fram (talk) 13:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Loren Coleman

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject fails notability. The article seems to violate WP:SELFPUB and a search for reliable sources only turned up a book review.  Justin  chat 16:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep A Google News search provides ample material for an article. Coleman has indeed edited the article, but he hasn't been the sole editor, and, FWIW, he left a message on the article talk page saying that he would try to stay away in the future. Zagalejo^^^ 18:15, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —David Eppstein (talk) 21:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I doubt he is notable as an academic particularly, but he does seem to be notable as a film producer and a lecturer on cryptozoology. Borderline semi-scientific subject field, but that isnt relevant. DGG (talk) 09:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.