Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loren Feldman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 20:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Loren_Feldman
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

puff piece. notability issues. self-promotion/advertisement.


 * Delete - As of yet I don't think the subject reaches the general notability guideline and as of yet fails to meet WP:ANYBIO. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 14:58, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 18:11, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and likely rollback to previous version. Numerous reliable sources exist and unfortunately this deletion effort seems tied to the main contributor rather than the article subject. -- Banj e  b oi   23:42, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete For reasons stated above. --216.244.65.73 (talk) 02:24, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The CNet news bit covers him well, they having someone even interview the guy in person, there video of that hosted on their site.   D r e a m Focus  06:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - fails WP:GNG and most of the refs point to blogs. The cnet reference is the most impressive, but I don't think this is enough to lift the subject into notability - A l is o n  ❤ 22:24, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * weak delete Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO. The sourcing is just below enough. I'd be willing to change my mind if more independent reliable sources were presented. JoshuaZ (talk) 22:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet general notability guideline or WP:ANYBIO. --64.120.158.21 (talk) 03:34, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a place for self-promotion. --98.143.144.94 (talk) 05:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep:  Numerous reliable sources exist. - Ret.Prof (talk) 09:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This doesn't meet general notability guideline/WP:ANYBIO. Regarding the google search results Ret.Prof links to, they don't quite yield "many reliable sources" as you suggest.  This article seems to be a self-promotion/advertisement.  --96.31.87.237 (talk) 17:18, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - There seems to be an unusually high level of contributions to this discussion from single purpose, possibly dynamic IP addresses. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 17:42, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.