Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loren McDaniel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:40, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Loren McDaniel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is decpetive because it has a very well developed citation body, but lots of weak and reliable citations do not overcome the problems the article has. McDaniel is not notable for anything past being Miss Arkansas, and that alone is not enough to justify an article. The citations are either to press releases and blogs of the competitions, to passing mention in articles about other people winning Miss Arkansas, or to her college paper or home town media. None of this is enough to establish notability for a beauty pageant contestant. My search for additional sources turned up nothing that would add towards passing the general notability guidelines. John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Miss Spirit of Arkansas 2014 or Miss Arkansas is enough to present notability. Not one of the 21 references present anything other than Miss Arkansas. The two references to Miss America, if they were not dead links, would be primary, and she placed in the top 15. The only actual attempt at notability would be Miss Arkansas so fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO1E. --- Otr500 (talk) 10:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  SST  flyer  12:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per prior outcomes; nothing stands out about this subject. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:14, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.