Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorenzo Ochoa Salas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Non-admin quick closure done in accordance with WP:SKCRIT, i.e. the nominator withdraws the nomination... because of improvements to the article that happen during the AfD that clearly overcome the issues raised in the original nomination. Apologies for the apparently insufficient WP:BEFORE! (non-admin closure) WhinyTheYounger (WtY) (talk, contribs)  00:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Lorenzo Ochoa Salas

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unable to find sourcing in English or Spanish that indicates Ochoa meets WP:NACADEMIC. WhinyTheYounger (WtY) (talk, contribs)  02:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC) Withdrawn per multitude of sources added by. WhinyTheYounger (WtY) (talk, contribs)  00:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)  (talk, contribs)  02:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)  (talk, contribs)  02:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * What's wrong with this for either NPROF or GNG? AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I am skeptical of the magazine article meeting NPROF, if anything because it is just a single source. While it asserted he was a giant of Mesoamerican studies, he does not seem to have been widely cited at all. If there were other sources similarly indicating his impact along the lines of the magazine article, it'd be a much stronger case, but as far as I could tell, that was about it (and the short obituary blog post also cited in the article). WhinyTheYounger (WtY) (talk, contribs)  03:25, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. We now have seven different reliably published articles about him and one more reliably published review of one of his books, all listed in the article. Regardless of whether he passes WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR, we have an easy pass of WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 20:14, 11 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.