Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Geary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  13:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Lori Geary

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There does not seem to be sufficient independent, non-routine coverage to pass WP:GNG. Also seems to be a decent amount of unencyclopedic cruft. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Noting batch nomination Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  05:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Television, Georgia (U.S. state), New York,  and Pennsylvania.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  11:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 05:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. Emmy-winner, no? Hyperbolick (talk) 07:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Regional Emmys, which can be a bit controversial but don’t generally confer notability. Also, you might want to sign your comment, User:Hyperbolick. I’m assuming you made a typo. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 20:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete: I can only see articles confirming she's joined a station, then left another station. Nothing extensive about her as a person. Oaktree b (talk) 11:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.