Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Watson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. As participants say, this is a borderline/ close call. Benefit of doubt goes to keep per WP:Deletion. JERRY talk contribs 02:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Lori Watson

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Although she's got a couple of awards she does not appear to have got enough notability. JASpencer (talk) 09:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  13:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  13:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - difficult to call, as she is apparently signed. --MacRusgail (talk) 16:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. The album released by the Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama seems enough to demonstrate notability by itself, by analogy to scholarly books published by a university press. --Eastmain (talk) 00:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Based on what's there this person isn't quite notable enough but I acknowledge it isn't far off. Spartaz Humbug! 10:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree it's borderline, and a few proper references would not go amiss but I'd give it the benefit of the doubt. There seem to be no few web hits. Ben MacDuiTalk /  Walk  17:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.