Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorrenzo Wade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 02:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Lorrenzo Wade

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet general WP:N requirements: no coverage in reliable sources. Nor does it meet the exception found in WP:ATHLETE: not a professional basketball player. 2008 Olym pian chit chat 07:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Although the subject does not meet the "professional athlete" standard of WP:Athlete, is there significant coverage by reliable third party sources for him to be notable under WP:N? Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  14:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I wouldn't say "no coverage in reliable sources" per 1, 2, though the sources seem to be localized. Article does not assert notability, as mentioned does not meet WP:ATHLETE. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 00:56, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - He was named a first-team all-Mountain West Conference player. That is plenty notable to me. Still, someone should add more information about his college career. GoCuse44 (talk) 19:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - OK, well, I ended up adding a little more information about this player. He's definitely notable, but the paragraphs I put in about his college career could still use more beef to them. GoCuse44 (talk) 19:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.