Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorrie Doriza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete without prejudice. Unsourced BLP. Any editor is free to recreate this article with sources so consider this a no consensus close. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:12, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Lorrie Doriza

 * – ( View AfD View log )

no notability here. closest this gets is a guest vocals on a single track on an album of questionable notability. lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. nothing satisfying wp:music. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:26, 5 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Probaly can be added onto in the near future with info from websites like IMDB. Person seems famous, singers and actresses usually are. Has Citations, always a plus. Stickulus (talk) 09:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi -- for us to give weight to your !vote, we need something stronger than a suggestion that the article can be improved in the future. Can you perhaps supply references that support your suggestion that Doriza is notable, according to wp's notability criteria?  Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — -- Cirt (talk) 00:37, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep, at least for now. There seems to be enough recent coverage out there to make the name a plausible search term ; but I'm not familiar enough with the subject to say whether she's independently notable or that the content should be preserved by merging into an article about Vespertina, or Stoupe, or whatever. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:00, 12 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi. It's not clear to me that sugarnthunder is an RS.  But I won't object to the article being deleted here and merged into any other article that is in fact notable, as reflected by RS support.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:24, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find sufficient RS support now reflecting notability, though the Queens Courier article is an RS and is a start ... but not sufficient, IMHO.  If she generates it in the future, I would of course support a new article.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:26, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.