Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorrie Stewart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete, but I'm re-listing Jesseca Turner just to be sure. — Mar. 9, '06 [03:43] 

Lorrie Stewart
Non-notable, onetime Playboy online model with no other credits, inexplicably stayed over a week on {prod} without being deleted, now challenged. Delete. Monicasdude 23:08, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages, all on {prod} for more than a week before challenged; all are also onetime Playboy online models with no outside credits:
 * Jesseca Turner
 * Stephenie Flickinger
 * Hailey Meyers
 * Sylvia Vargova
 * Delete them all for being non-notable biographies, unless WP has to have a page for every Playboy centrefold there ever was. WP:BIO refers.  (aeropagitica)   23:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete We had another of these last week, Articles for deletion/Amber Marie that was deleted. Creator User:Bubbaspuds has created an entry for every Playboy Cyber Girl of the week. It's fine if someone wants to list them, but they don't need individual pages unless they have some other notability. Most of the models' articles are barely stubs. Fan1967 01:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all, per nom. Pavel Vozenilek 02:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Jesseca Turner - abstain on the rest: That one has a whole bunch of other credits listed. I could be talked out of this one though if someone has more knowledge about what those credits are but, if she's been in magazines that many times, that seems notable.  —Wknight94 (talk) 04:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * At best Merge/Redirect to Cyber Girl of the Week. We can probably drive up a bulldozer and merge in nearly every page linked off Cyber Girl of the Week, of which there are vast multitudes. ;-) &mdash; RJH 17:15, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.