Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Angeles Riot Squad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Los Angeles Riot Squad

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

As per original research, this article make so many claims that are OR. Also the article fails WP:Cite and has so much WP:POV it reads like a fan site Gnevin 01:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --Akhilleus (talk) 04:00, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 08:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment this group does exist and its existence is verifiable, so issues of POV or OR do not make convincing grounds for deletion. What should be the issues is whether they are notable to satisfy WP:N, and that case has not been made here, yet. Qwghlm 08:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable fan group. Robotforaday 14:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I concur that WP:Cite, WP:POV, and WP:NOR are not the critical issues here. The question is whether the group is notable.  If it is, then those other issues should be addressed by corrective edits on the article.  As it stands, there doesn't appear to be any assertion that this group is particularly noteworthy, so I think it violates WP:N. JCO312 14:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete needs independent sources to verify that the fangroup is notable.-- danntm T C 16:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Rudjek 20:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - probably not notable enough for now (I don't look at no. of hits)  Insane  phantom   (my Editor Review)  23:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Angelo 16:30, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable fan group. BlankVerse 07:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.