Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Angeles Stadium and Event Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:54, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Los Angeles Stadium and Event Center

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject is a proposed project currently with minimum information available, lacking notability and numerous sources. Suggesting deletion and/or merger since the same information can and already is covered at History of the National Football League in Los Angeles -- Unquestionable Truth -- 07:20, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks reference of sources to support article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meritstarzzz (talk • contribs) 15:11, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep This article sites its sources.  There is no reason for deletion.--Jkfp2004 (talk) 01:12, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep There obviously needs to be more sources and should probably be reworked, but this article should definitely stay. --Andyhi18 (talk) 13:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep but possibly merge. There are ample sources available about the proposals for the downtown stadium, including extensive coverage of the three recently-announced finalists for the stadium design, e.g.  However, since all of this still speculative, query if it would make a better presentation of the material to merge this together with Los Angeles Stadium (which discusses Edward P. Roski's rival plan for Industry, California)?  If not, renaming should be considered for disambiguation purposes—maybe Los Angeles Stadium (downtown) and Los Angeles Stadium (City of Industry).--Arxiloxos (talk) 06:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * According to both websites, the Industry project is titled "Los Angeles Stadium" while the downtown project is titled "Los Angeles Events Center" which means that this article is inaccurately named. Now, my argument is that the same basic information over this subject (the Events Center) is already covered with very identical text on History of the National Football League in Los Angeles which begs the question... Is this article warranted? The article also needs additional reliable sources if the argument is made that there is in fact sufficient information on the subject to warrant an article. As I noted above, I basically Support merger. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 07:09, 21 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep apparently a current hot topic in the news and there is no shortage of sources. No objection to possible future deletion if the project stalls and goes nowhere after, say. a year. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:17, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, but if more info cannot be found or added soon, I support a merger with History of the National Football League in Los Angeles. The page on Roski's proposal in Industry (Los Angeles Stadium), I believe has enough information to be separate from the History of the NFL in LA article. --CASportsFan (talk) 07:27, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, It is an ongoing process, negotiations are underway and indeed is a "hot topic" in L.A. Added more info today. DocOfSoc (talk) 08:00, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.