Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Burros, Arizona


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Los Burros Ranger Station. Liz Read! Talk! 06:41, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Los Burros, Arizona

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This place fails GEOLAND and GNG as it is neither legally recognized nor significantly covered. Maps show a spring and campground; newspapers mention a CCC camp as well as the campground but again not enough to establish notability. Not to be confused with the other Los Burros in California. –dlthewave ☎ 03:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arizona. –dlthewave ☎ 03:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * It does have two places that are on NRHP, so call me a keep CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 03:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * That would be a redirect to Los Burros Ranger Station, no? –dlthewave ☎ 03:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)


 * redirect to Los Burros Ranger Station, the NRHP site at this location. The text of the article indicates that there was no settlement here preceding the station. Mangoe (talk) 03:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Redirect Not a separate topic from the ranger station. Reywas92Talk 04:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting, Redirect has the numbers but there are some opinions that this article should be Kept. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:21, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is not currently a settlement, it is currently a camp site.  However, The Best in Tent Camping: Arizona has enough on it for an article to be viable.  As well as a ranger station, according to that source, it has previously been a camp for timber workers.  The coverage is over five or six pages. SpinningSpark 12:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not aware of any other articles on individual national forest camp sites, even if there are plenty of guides like this one that give a few pages on each of at least 42 in just Arizona. The ranger station article mentions the camp site and that can be expanded, and forest articles like Apache–Sitgreaves National Forests are always in need of expansion like listings of recreation areas. That book covers at least nine of them (on pages with previews) here. Reywas92Talk 15:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above, given the lack of verifiable evidence the subject is a populated place. Even if it was a populated place in the past per WP:GEOLAND it wouldn't get automatic notability as it's not legally recognised, and it doesn't pass the GNG. Writing an article about a campsite based purely on information in travel guides would violate WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE, unless it's got substantial coverage outside travel guides.  Hut 8.5  09:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. MB 02:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.