Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Plantanos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No major independent notability was established; no reliable sources, especially that of a third-party; leaning towards original research in others seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  00:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Los Plantanos

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an element of Kaiju Big Battel that does not establish independent notability. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it doesn't need to exist. TTN (talk) 18:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related pages because the are also minor elements of it that do not establish independent notability:

TTN (talk) 18:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all no individual notability. Merge into charactor list.   Reywas92 Talk  20:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all as there is no independent notability. I don't think even merging is justified here as there aren't any worthwhile refs either. Stifle (talk) 20:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all I think the show makes a play at being nonsensical, so that might explain the article structure and prose. I was originally leery of supporting deletion for these articles, but the nom is correct.  where there are sources they are cited to the makers of the performance piece and DVD only.  Often there aren't sources.  Borderline WP:OR claims are made, though with no sources, how can we really tell?  Main article cites little coverage&mdash;I'm sure the main topic is notable and that lack of coverage will be rectified in time but I imagine that the sort of coverage the main topic wil receive won't trickle down to sub-topics.  I'm not sure a merge is the way to go, either to a list or to the main article.  Post deletion redirects or just redirects might also work. Protonk (talk) 04:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Not individually notable characters/events/etc. One brief "coming events" piece in NYT is insufficient to establish notability of a performance. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all per the RS and N points raised in the nom. Eusebeus (talk) 17:25, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Non-notable fictional elements. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 22:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.