Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los poco locos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 14:07, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Los poco locos
NN, probably vanity &asymp; jossi fresco &asymp; t &bull; @ 02:26, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Soared all the way to #637 and you don't think their notable? Are you a Freaking idiot!!!... I agree with you 100% Jossifresco. Definitely NN. Croat Canuck 02:42, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for failure to satisfy WP:MUSIC and being unverifiable. --Metropolitan90 02:55, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, can't information about the band or their record. Not listed in AMG. JoaoRicardo 05:34, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  18:27, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, bandcruft. Stifle 23:04, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Vanity with some overtones of hoaxery: "In 2003 Lime Magazine ranked Los Poco Locos the sexiest new pseudo-Hispanic artist with a name containing the phrase “Poco Locos”. Contenders in the category included Esmeralda Fernanda Poco Locos-Rodriguez, who drove her car over Scarborough Bluffs subsequent to the announcement and remains to be found." Er, no. And, for that matter, record charts don't even compile down to 637th place. Delete. Bearcat 19:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.