Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost (Cher Lloyd song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) 2pou (talk) 04:23, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Lost (Cher Lloyd song)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Although this single charted, I do not think it has received enough significant coverage from reliable, third-party sources to support an independent article. I believe the coverage is rather minimal and not enough to be considered significant. For that reason, I believe it fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS. Aoba47 (talk) 02:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 02:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 02:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion:? This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Logs:


 * Keep: The song has received some coverage. I also found some reliable sources about the song:, , , , and . With these, the article is good enough to pass WP:NSONG  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the message, but I have issues with half of these sources. I would not consider CelebMix to be a reliable source, and there was a WP:RSN discussion (here) with a consensus that it is not reliable. It is discouraged to use the Daily Mail on Wikipedia per this so that is not usable. The Universal Music Group source is a primary source since that company released the single. Notability should be established by third-party coverage. I am uncertain about Spettacolo as I have never seen that site before. However, three of the six sources provided are not usable for Wikipedia and I still fail to see a convincing argument there is significant coverage. Aoba47 (talk) 18:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 17:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - Song charted and was mentioned in media above and in  would therefore pass WP:NSONG.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DoctorAB (talk • contribs) 16:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)


 * That's fair. I am still uncertain if there is enough significant coverage, but since there seems to be a growing consensus for keep, I will respect that, and I would like to withdraw this nomination. Aoba47 (talk) 20:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.