Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost (TV series) inventory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 03:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Lost (TV series) inventory

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is listcruft and should be deleted per WP:NOT, which states that "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of items of information. That something is 100% true does not automatically mean it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia." -- Wikipedical 01:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, as nominator. --  Wikipedical 01:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as listcruft per WP:NOT, not even worth merging into Lost (TV series). Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 01:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Whstchy 02:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete this is a badly organized set of information, if it belonged anywhere, it'd be on the Lostpedia, but I'm sure they have better. FrozenPurpleCube 02:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I've never seen a better example of indiscriminate information than this article. Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ 04:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete echoing the above, this list is a random and non-selective collection of information. — An as  talk? 09:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. This is an encyclopedia not a fan website, this information is better off at Lostpedia if they do not have anything about inventory over at the other side. Totally listcruft and fancruft. Terence 11:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- per WP:NOT, anything of significance is already in the main article Thunderwing 11:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR that failed to include Nikki who was sadly buried alive. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 17:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I think it deserves to be LOSTBalloonman 21:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as all above. Elrith 00:04, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete sorry for making it in the first place; Lostpedia is realy the appropriate place for this content... Alinor 20:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

'Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks!' -- Mailer Diablo 03:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.