Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost Island Census


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. RobertG &#9836; talk 09:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Lost Island Census
Delete. This is a minor element of a TV show and not worthy of a separate article. Even within the Characters of Lost article it is close to being fancruft. Rillian 21:00, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * To clarify - this content was already part of Characters of Lost and has been restored there. Rillian 21:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Characters article is long enough. --Ton e 21:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is a potentially unlimited list of articles possible for Lost; we've got to keep that list focused on the important stuff, not just proliferate articles. -- PKtm 22:07, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete These kinds of articles put focus on quantity over quality. Jtrost (T | C | #) 00:10, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete A brand new article is not necessary. The information is contained on the Characters of Lost page. Danflave 20:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Also far too close to OR. It's a nightmare for WP:CITE! TheGrappler 23:17, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Rillian. it's just a tv show. Munckin 07:21, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Danflave. Sweetie Petie 17:00, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, the article is not neccesary. The census in the main characters article is enough.--Gonzalo84 19:07, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with the Characters of LOST article. Most of the info is overlapping, but there are some things that were removed from the "characters" page and put here. If this page is so "offensive" - just return these things to their original location... Alinor 19:52, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with the Characters of LOST article. Kant2k6 18:11, 17 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.