Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost Lake Resort, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Lost Lake Resort, California

 * – ( View AfD View log )

As the name and the article both say, it is just a resort, as it ever has been. Not a settlement, and I see no sign that it is notable as a resort. Mangoe (talk) 02:23, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Another California non-settlement.- Kieran207  talk  02:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete resorts are not default notable, and nothing suggests this one is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom, fails GNG and NGEO. WP:GEOLAND "informal regions of a state, unofficial neighborhoods, etc. – any of which could be considered notable on a case-by-case basis, given non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources."  // Timothy ::  talk  00:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.