Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost and Found Pet Web Sites


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:57, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Lost and Found Pet Web Sites

 * — (View AfD)

I believe this falls under the category not the Yellow Pages. I just don't see anyway to expand this into a proper encyclopedia article. Pascal.Tesson 06:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.-- Dakota 07:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Could be expanded to include other methods of finding lost pets, preventing pets getting lost, studies on effects of lost pets etc. Google Scholar lost pet search WP 09:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment sorry if I sound blunt but what exactly do you think the "lost pet" search in Google Scholar proves? That "lost pets" are an academic subject? I don't think you bothered to look at what those references show because you probably would have then noticed that more than anything the dismal results support deletion. As for your call for the article to be expanded, you might notice that this would mean writing an article that has nothing to do with the title of this one. Pascal.Tesson 20:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Sad Delete. I applaud any effort to return lost pets to their owners, but this is clearly a website list, which falls under WP:NOT a web guide. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. We are not an internet directory. --Adam Riley Talk 20:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This article is most certainly a directory. -- Whpq 22:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Definitely a directory or guide. --Woohookitty(meow) 11:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.