Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost at sea records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Lost at sea records

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A non notable record label. Only one artist signed and only an EP released, both redlinked and non-notable. No significant 3rd party coverage. Only blogs and myspace. The claim on Jon Astley appears to be unverifiable. Also possible COI/self-promotion, see. Fails WP:CORP Iam (talk) 05:28, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I PRODded the article a while ago. I'm surprised to see it's still around. Non-notable. — Malik Shabazz 05:50, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it looks like an anonymous IP removed your PROD . Iam (talk) 06:05, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  06:52, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:CORP.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 02:41, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note – The nominator has been blocked for sockpuppetry. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.