Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost babies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Lost babies

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable film; fails WP:MOVIE ttonyb1 (talk) 17:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't understand why this was tagged to be deleted. It was FEATURED ON ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY'S WEBSITE - I realize that this form of entertainment (movie) was not released in theaters, but how much more references are needed? Nothing is a reliable source unless its a printed newspaper, but most of WIKI is more bogus than what you claim this page is. In the meantime - what is this page? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Fensler There are no article or references about this - it could be all made up, just like most of wikipedia. Please take back your suggestion for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dgoodberg (talk • contribs) 17:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Just noting, it wasn't featured on the main part of Entertainment Weekly's website - it was only featured on their "Popwatch" blog. Radiant chains (talk) 18:00, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Attacking Wikipedia's validity sounds like an odd reasoning for wanting to keep an entry on Wikipedia. Wperdue (talk) 20:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)wperdue


 * Delete It fails WP:MOVIE and the sources don't meet the standards. As for the other entry mentioned by the original editor, I don't particularly see why it's notable either, but that isn't the subject of this AFD. Wperdue (talk) 20:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)wperdue
 * Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 06:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.