Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost in the Hood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Lost in the Hood

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The BBFC source is about another movie entirely. The other two sources are adult industry publicity and thus not independent Ficaia (talk) 12:58, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 13:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Georgia (U.S. state).  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * delete I found one source in Scholar: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137291998_9 haven’t read it, don’t know if it’s reliable, at least seems to prove it was actually banned by the BBFC. Otherwise nothing, just a common generic phrase used as a porno plot because of course it was. Hell, none of the performers or crew in this thing are even notable. Overall I think the standard is that individual modern pornos are almost never notable since they’re a dime a dozen and have no substantial content besides… well, pornography, meaning there’s hardly ever anything to review or cover by mainstream sources. Dronebogus (talk) 15:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The most value this article has to readers is probably the unintentional humor of the dry plot summary. Also, “tray miller”’s first result is a beer tray. Dronebogus (talk) 15:10, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.