Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LotLinx


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

LotLinx

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:NPRODUCT. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:42, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:44, 14 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - sources that aren't first-party or press releases are 8-sentence articles. Awards are a subsector award that have not yet gotten a Wikipedia page and likely won't. Sufficient signs of notability not given. --Nat Gertler (talk) 19:44, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - besides the overt press releases, the little coverage that isn't that looks suspiciously like Phil Space got a press release on a slow afternoon and constructed an article around it. Pinkbeast (talk) 21:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete 13 references to the company's own website, 2 to prnewwire, articles that start with "LotLinx today announced", a non-notable award and a whole bunch of rewritten press releases from the automotive press. I don't see any truly independent in-depth reporting. Vexations (talk) 16:09, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Despite the large references section replaying the company's press release history, these do not meet the requirements at WP:NCORP. Nor do Automotive Website Awards indicate inherent notability for the company's product range. I see nothing to indicate more than a company going about its business: fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.