Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lota Hadley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. There was little interest in this discussion, but considered the bare, unsupported assertion of notability to fail in the face of the brief, but policy-driven "delete" comments. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  20:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Lota Hadley

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO.  ttonyb (talk) 16:48, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - the article consists of mauch stuff scheduled for the future and a pile of name-dropping. Her actual production record shows no awards or critical recognition nor is there significant coverage in reliable sources.  The article does provide this link but the coverage is insubstantial, and certainly inadequate to establish notability on its own. -- Whpq (talk) 17:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I feel that this person is notable in her field. Friuli (talk) 22:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you explain why she is notable, and how this is documented in reliable sources? Just declaring that you think she is notable isn't persuasive. -- Whpq (talk) 23:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.