Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lotus Grove


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. &mdash; J I P | Talk 07:46, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Lotus Grove

 * Delete Lack of importance. It is not known even in the home country Sri Lanka. It is just a housing project like everywhere elese. I think it does not deserve a place in an encyclopaedia. It has no notability or nothing special even if we look within Sri Lanka. This is not the first of its kind in Sri Lanka as it is claimed, plus it is baseless for it claims. --Sechzehn 08:59, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now.  No opinion. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 15:47, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. The first planned, gated community in Sri Lanka? Sounds notable to me. -- howcheng  [ talk &#149; contribs &#149; web ] 17:05, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per howcheng  CalJW 21:00, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * If it is the first community of its kind, it is notable enough to keep. Denni &#9775; 01:35, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. This article sounds like it was written by the sales agent for the development. Nominator states that claim to be "first of its kind" in Sri Lanka is NOT true, so unless the article's assertion on that point is verified, this seems like a non-notable subdivision. -- DS1953 talk 05:36, 22 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.