Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loudoun Hounds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 18:33, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Loudoun Hounds

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no website. There has not now nor has there ever been a game played or a team signed to play games. George Bounacos (talk) 19:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - I moved the AfD from Talk:Loudoun Hounds to the actual article and should have fixed everything else. ansh 666 20:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - (for now) - The lead accurately states, "The Loudoun Hounds are a planned minor league baseball team". The efforts are not over yet, though they have degenerated into lawsuits. When this reaches a conclusion, and if it is a failure, then this information might be better summarized in the Atlantic League of Professional Baseball article -- Pemilligan (talk) 14:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


 * 4-Bagger Keep: Would the nom like to put forth a deletion rationale that's actually in our policies and guidelines? There's nothing in WP:V, WP:N or the GNG about the need for subjects to have websites or players signed.  The subject meets the GNG going away: it's a done deal.  Nha Trang  Allons! 16:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep; meets WP:GNG, even if they never play a a game. Notability is not temporary, nor does it lapse because plans change. oknazevad (talk) 00:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.