Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loudoun School For The Gifted


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented. The article is not tagged for notability concerns. Articles not being expanded is typically not a valid reason for deletion (see WP:NOEFFORT, not a guideline page, but informative). For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. North America1000 07:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Loudoun School For The Gifted

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has multiple issues that have never been resolved over many years. There seems to be no desire to expand this beyond it's current stub. Apriestofgix (talk) 18:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Snow keep - Since when is article quality or lack of improvement a valid reason for deletion? The nomination is faulty, that's why the "snow". The school meets notability for a school as it is a diploma granting institution (an accredited diploma granting institution, a claim many if not most schools we have articles on can't make. See this) so keep per guidelines and outcomes. John from Idegon (talk) 19:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Snow keep. In addition to the usual presumption that we keep articles about verified high schools, in this case there's actual coverage readily found, such as these recent Washington Post articles  and more from other sources such as   That an article has remained a stub for a long time is not grounds to delete it: there's no deadline.--Arxiloxos (talk) 22:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per all the reasons above unfortunately, because it is a blatant piece of spam. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * That it is spam was a joke, right? The only content is just "Loudoun School For The Gifted is a private school for advanced studies in grades 6-12 located in Ashburn, Virginia."  And no one removed spam to get it to that.  I probably misunderstand what spam is, but the content sounds to me like it could simply be factual. -- do  ncr  am  04:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Nomination reasons not valid.  I haven't checked sources suggested above by other editors, but expect they check out as establishing notability. -- do  ncr  am  04:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.