Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Bernacchi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 22:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Louis Bernacchi
Delete no established notablity. Kiwidude 01:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. He was a party member of a pretty notable expedition. Aplomado - UTC 01:46, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. JoshuaZ 02:16, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand as notable explorer. The Australian Dictionary of Biography has an article on him which I intend to use to expand this.Capitalistroadster 02:27, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Article has been duly expanded. Capitalistroadster 09:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * keep per aplomado. Bucketsofg 02:39, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge Newyorktimescrossword 02:53, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 02:32, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable. Cnwb 02:41, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. An important early explorer. -- Ian &equiv; talk 04:07, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Look forward to Capitalistroadster's additions --  Samir  [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px]]   (the scope)  04:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep --CrypticBacon 04:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep --Ter e nce Ong 05:40, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as expanded by Capitalistroadster, looks good. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 09:22, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per all. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  14:12, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep notable Funky Monkey 22:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * keep please imporant to australian history erasing makes no sense Yuckfoo 04:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep notable, why would anyone think otherwise? There are plenty of references to him.  --Ishel99 07:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * keep. recipients of the Order of the British Empire and the Légion d'honneur are inherently notable. --Scott Davis Talk 08:10, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * keep. recipients of the Order of the British Empire and the Légion d'honneur are inherently notable. --Scott Davis Talk 08:10, 19 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.