Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Guay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Despite the minimal discussion, the conclusion is straightforward enough  DGG ( talk ) 08:06, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Louis Guay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:GNG, hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Hack (talk) 09:04, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 10:46, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:16, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The prior version that existed until the subject himself overwrote it with a self-penned puffbio in September of this year actually cited some real sources, albeit not nearly enough to actually get him over WP:GNG. That said, it didn't make a particularly strong or substantive claim of notability — if all you can write about a person is that they got kidnapped, then at best they're just a WP:BLP1E. This version, meanwhile, is a completely unsourced prosified résumé — but we're not LinkedIn, so a person simply isn't entitled to keep this sort of thing regardless of their notability or lack thereof. Delete; no prejudice against future recreation in the unlikely event that somebody can write and source it properly. Bearcat (talk) 07:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.