Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Kek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete.  MBisanz  talk 19:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Louis Kek

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:AUTO. There is some coverage so no point in CSD or PROD. So does this person pass WP:BIO? The famous web search engine gives some coverage, but much WP:SPS. triwbe (talk) 15:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   —triwbe (talk) 15:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable, conflict of interest. Equendil Talk 18:17, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Company may be notable (that's another discussion) but there is nothing in the 63 unique GHits to suggest this person is. Nuttah (talk) 08:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete – Copyright violation of this site …Sorry ShoesssS Talk 16:26, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Copyvio, advertising, and a non-notable local ISP.  Utgard Loki (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * SPEEDY DELETE? I was under the impression that a copyright violation = instantaneous deletion with fire.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  18:36, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.