Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Cliffe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Non-admin closure.  Jujutacular  T · C 18:50, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Louise Cliffe

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Questionable notability: I'm not sure whether Miss Manchester and Miss Maxim count as notable awards - neither of them have articles. One film credit doesn't qualify as a notable actor. RoadieRich (talk) 01:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Scott Mac (Doc) 16:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - Except for IMDB most of the sources to be found are self-promotional or comments on her modeling shots. My vote is "weak" because like the nominator I see the notability as questionable. She has been in a possibly notable film, and the fact that her non-acting (i.e. modeling) has gained fans and notice in places like AskMen indicates that she might be close to meeting #2 of WP:ENTERTAINER. But I don't think she's quite notable yet. D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 03:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Coverage in Daily Star and Manchester Evening News satisfy WP:N Dlabtot (talk) 18:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep While certainly her pagents got her into the news, they also allowed her coverage from 2005 through 2009 . Not at all surprising that the articles speak toward her wins. Even if the awards themselves might not be notable, her coverage grants her notability per WP:GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:53, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of significant coverage in reliable sources, clearly meets WP:BIO. Wine Guy  ~Talk  08:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.