Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Elisabeth Robertson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 23:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Louise Elisabeth Robertson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be a vanity biography largely written by the subject and not meeting NAUTHOR. Every book appears to be published by a vanity press "Dog Ear Publishing offers something incredibly dynamic to authors looking to self-publish". One award received is highly dubious, issued by "American Book Fest" which, near as I can tell by visiting their website, does nothing other than issue this self-nominated award and doesn't even have a listed phone number. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:40, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 15:41, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 15:41, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I was alerted to this AfD through a question from on my talk page. I went back and rechecked the databases. Nothing about her is turning up in EBSCO, HighBeam or on Newspapers.com. She doesn't pass GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per MLB; if they say it's gone—it's gone. Don't look at me, I only work here. —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 19:20, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not Linkedin where people engage in self-promotion. This reminds me of the person I knew who would have created an article on herself in Wikipedia if it did not directly advise against it. She was convinced she was notable for being an editor on a Harry Potter fan-fiction website. Maybe moderator would be a better word for what she did. Sort of like all the articles we have on moderators of Lois and Clark fan fiction websites. Oh wait, we dont. There is a reason that we have a rule do not create an article on yourself. Too many people think they are much more important than they are. Especially too many 22-year-olds.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:18, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:AUTHOR.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:49, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment What about being a fellow of the Royal Society of the Arts. Is that not notable? scope_creep (talk) 22:30, 19 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.