Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Germaine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 01:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Louise Germaine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Really no career to speak of and the references are all tabloids. No “sources” out there could save this. Trillfendi (talk) 14:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment For anyone actually interested in sources, quick search finds, among other coverage, a 1300-word front page profile in The Times and a summary of her career in the academic book Talk of Drama . Granted, her TV/film roles did not stray far from Dennis Potter. Bakazaka (talk) 18:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Possibly notable The article needs to be developed Lubbad85 (talk) 21:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject meets requirements of WP:ENT, article clearly needs to be developed. WCM email 14:15, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found by Bakazaka. Aside from that, I'm not sure that the condescending tone used in the nomination itself was necessary. matt91486 (talk) 10:30, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I did find another article here, which is mainly a review of a TV movie, but does touch on Germaine's acting ability for a rather considerable portion of it. It wasn't immediately clear to me how to incorporate it into the text, but wanted to document it in case anyone is doing a rewrite of the article. matt91486 (talk) 10:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.