Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Zarmati


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep clear keep consensus based on newly found information. (non-admin closure) Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Louise Zarmati

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable academic. Google Scholar lists Zarmati's h-index as 5 (a higher number than I calculated myself by going through the publications listed in the article), which falls short of WP:NACADEMIC. I don't see any other evidence in the article or online that she meets WP:NACADEMIC or WP:GNG. Based on this source, she was awarded a Churchill Fellowship in 2005 and NSW Premier's History Scholarship in 2012 as research grants, and an educational program she consulted for won a National Trust (NSW) Heritage award for best education program in 2011. It's unclear to me, however, that these awards meet WP:ANYBIO. signed,Rosguill talk 23:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep
 * Lead or only author, or co-author, of at least 11 books almost all of which are held in multiple national and state libraries and in major university libraries - I think satisifies AUTHOR.
 * Recipient of three grants from respected institutions, eg, Churchill - I think this satisifies professional recognised standing, and combined easily satisfies ANYBIO.
 * Does have some peer reviewed and cited publications.
 * Has been a contributor to national education curriculum standards - easily satisfies very high level of recognition in area of professional academic expertise.
 * Coverage is across wide range of education and professional publications, and also general media, and is sustained. Aoziwe (talk) 04:11, 5 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep I have added her textbooks to the Select publications, and reviews I have found of some of them. I believe the book reviews, and being selected as a writer of the History learning area in the Australian Curriculum, among other factors, show the recognition she is accorded in her field (whether that is WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NACADEMIC ). RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. On the basis of new information (above). Britishfinance (talk) 14:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep less than 30 of the 73 Australian Archaeologists on wikipedia are women, weighting here for gender+WP:CSB is relevant.--Goldsztajn (talk) 16:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.