Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise van Oosten (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Louise van Oosten
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Survived a WP:TRAINWRECK. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL. WP:GNG is also failed. Apart from this all I could find was routine coverage such as transfers, match reports and call ups to the Dutch youth international teams. Dougal18 (talk) 11:52, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:23, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:23, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:23, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:23, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. A news search turned up two trivial mentions in game recaps, which obviously do not contribute to notability. I would also note that the source found in the nom mostly contains quotes from an interview, with essentially no secondary analysis by the author; primary sources such as interviews have historically not been considered sufficient to count towards notability. JoelleJay (talk) 17:23, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:50, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 21:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftify. While she currently fails our standards, she is only 17 and is with a top-level club so I think WP:TOOSOON for deletion. No Great Shaker (talk) 21:27, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * There is no professional women's league in the Netherlands. Draftifying would be making a prediction that she would either play for the Netherlands national team or transfer to a WP:FPL club in the next six months. I say six months because without editing that's when the draft is deleted. Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I also could find only two trivial news pieces, which are insufficient to meet WP:GNG. If more information becomes available, this article can be recreated at a later date. Avilich (talk) 01:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, doesn't look like there's any substantial sources out there (there's also none on the nl.wiki article about her, which I may have expected if good Dutch language sources existed). Joseph2302 (talk) 07:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet any Wikipedia guideline. Geschichte (talk) 08:14, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WCM email 12:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree that Van Oosten does not currently meet our notability criteria for biographies, searches show that she exists but has not garnered enough coverage that is truly in-depth Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The individual fails WP:NSOCCER, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:BASIC. There's no evidence of significant coverage of this individual, and, while there are database sources that reference her, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 22:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.