Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louisville (Jann Browne song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tell Me Why (Jann Browne album). Overall consensus is for redirection. North America1000 05:51, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Louisville (Jann Browne song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Song charted, but spent only one week at what was then the lowest position (the country airplay chart only goes to 60 now). There are no secondary sourcings anywhere that verify anything about this song other than it existed, and precedent is to redirect individually non-notable songs to their albums or artists. However, every time I've done this, it has been rejected by with no explanation. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  04:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * By my reading of the general notability guideline, that would make this a delete or a redirect. I come across song articles without significant coverage in reliable sources all the time – there must be thousands of them – and asked this question in a general way at WT:SONGS. I did not receive any useful answer. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * keep, according to this article in the LA Times it was "was named Country Song of the Year by the California Country Music Assn". Frietjes (talk) 15:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Jonesey95, I would think being named song of the year by the California Country Music Association, as documented by the LA Times would satisfy notability requirements. Frietjes (talk) 15:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Well then, let's keep this one, since the article documents coverage in reliable sources. That's one unreferenced song article fixed, a thousand to go.... – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * , and what makes the California Country Music Association notable? I can't even find concrete proof that it exists. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I take your point, but this discussion is not about California Country Music Association, it's about the song, which has been covered in at least one reliable source. I'm not a notability guru, but I think that means it passes. I'm happy to be set straight if I am wrong. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Would you object to redirecting to the album then, as that is the precedent for seemingly non notable songs? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:24, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Find with me. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:35, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 13:31, 14 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to album as this may be best, even with the current article seeming enough, it may be bested connected to the album. SwisterTwister   talk  05:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.