Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love4Sound


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Love4Sound

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Rather confusing article about a non-notable record label; article also appears to be copy-pasted from various other articles. Prod contested by IP without reason.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 03:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete- Non-notable company, no place in Wikipedia.Ireneshih (talk) 11:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Non-notable aside, created by banned user (Love4Sound) and also a double creation where a substantially similar article was created within hours of each other.--Cahk (talk) 03:15, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom and above editors.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.