Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love: Destiny (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar   &middot;   &middot;  07:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Love: Destiny
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable - no significant coverage by any major media, as far as I can find Adabow (talk) 07:00, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. 07:02, 22 July 2013 (UTC) Adabow (talk) 07:02, 22 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment Destiny's Child is a notable band and releasing of this EP is verifiable . If we can not find sources needed for a stand alone article, we can redirect and merge the information to Destiny's Child discography. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 11:04, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I am disputing neither the notability of Destiny's Child nor the existence of the EP, but the only things written about the EP are merely that it exists&mdash;no reviews, no background, et cetera. Destiny's Child discography already summarises this article. Adabow (talk) 11:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, but potential redirect pointing to the summary may serve better than red link, don't you think? --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 11:22, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think there would be any cases where the article would be redlinked, as it is only linked from the navbox and the discography page. Love: Destiny should instead redirect to Love (Destiny). Adabow (talk) 22:43, 22 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Theopolisme ( talk )  05:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Comment - User:Vejvančický notability is not inherited or inherent, I don't know how I'd would conform notability with this EP, it indeed lacks reviews, coverage, since it was a limited issue and edition. The only mention I found was in this site, which stated some reasons and background info behind this release. Maybe a further research may provide more details. Eduemoni↑talk↓ </b> 18:07, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:09, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:34, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.