Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love But Not Betrayed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete. 15:44, 22 July 2010 Toddst1 (talk | contribs) deleted "Love But Not Betrayed" ‎ (Speedy deleted per CSD A1, was a very short article providing little or no context. using TW) (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:44, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Love But Not Betrayed

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I declined the speedy on this myself because it's borderline. I then prodded it but the creator contested it. Point blank: what's going on in this article? Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


 * UPDATE: Article was speedy deleted, and author has been indef-blocked for threatening users. Closure requested. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment Delete. It looks like it's about a TV series, but I can't see much beyond that. The creator just removed the AfD template; I've warned him for vandalism and put it back.  It looks like this is about some project a few friends got together and put on youtube or something like that, but I really can't tell for sure.  The only reason I didn't nominate it for speedy deletion as a hoax is that it isn't quite as blatant a hoax as one would want for that, and I don't think this is covered under the notability-based criteria for speedy deletion either.  We might WP:SNOW this, however.  --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 21:14, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The creator has now been reported to AIV for continuing to delete the AfD template. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 07:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * And subsequently blocked for 24 hours. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * He or she removed the AfD notice again as soon as the block expired. Reported to AIV again. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:43, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete (I still favor speedy), no context, likely a hoax or complete nonsense. No references at all. Appears to be a TV series, but who can tell for sure? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, perhaps speedy delete. Finding about this via Google was very easy and took almost no time. It is not a television series. It is a "fan fiction" series written by an amateur on a web site. The article is full of misinformation: for example it says "It had the most viewers in TV history", which is nonsense, as this is not on television. I think this is borderline for speedy deletion under at least two counts: hoax and no context. Realkyhick has also already said "I still favor speedy". Anyone else think speedy deletion? JamesBWatson (talk) 08:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.