Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Chords


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   A9 (I love saying that) by TexasAndroid, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:19, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Love Chords

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Album article for a band that was recently deleted. Fails WP:MUSIC. Also nominating other release below. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)




 * Delete primary nominee. No evidence of notability. Keep secondary nominee. It is improper to try to combine nominations like this. —the Ghost of Adrian Mineha! hold seance at 10:09, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, can you explain why it is improper to combine these together? They are afterall related and nominated for the same reason.... Cheers Nouse4aname (talk) 10:12, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Combining nominations can make it hard to identify consensus. What if some people think that two articles are basically hopeless for the same reason, and others don't?  Then the closer will have to try to untangle who means to say that both should go, who means to say that both should stay, who means that the first should go and the second should stay, and who means that the first should stay and the second should go.  People often write without thinking about how their words could be misinterpretted, so this could lead to many problems.
 * Wikipedia has a policy WP:WAX. The case for each article really isn't supposed to be made based on the idea that a similar article got a particular sort of treatment.  I guess that there is a fear of foolishness being applied ''consistently.
 * Please create a separate nomination for the second article. —the Ghost of Adrian Mineha! hold seance at 10:33, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Although I agree that joint nominations are often ridiculous and painful, I think this is one of those occasions where the joint nomination of two articles is appropriate. The articles are very closely related in subject (being the first and second albums of the band "The Papsmears", which has so far been speedily deleted twice for failing to meet speedy deletion criteria A7 (band which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant), in current state (both articles are equally lacking in reliable, independant sources, and are equally lacking in content), and in prospective state (A google search for the band shows Myspace postings, local gig guides, and noise from the medical proceedure in Vanilla Google and zilch in News Google; plugging in the first album's title as an additional qualifier brings the result count right down... most of the results are Wikipedia/Wiki-mirrors or databases, and I didn't look up the second album because it is untitled, therefore much harder to search)
 * The only case for difference is that the first album was released but does not have any claim to fame beyond making a university campus radio station's Top 30 playlist (if you choose to believe the band's myspace page), while the second album does not exist yet. This does not change the fact that both albums are the product of a band that does not appear to pass the notability inclusion guidelines for bands and music, both articles lack reliable, third-party sources, and at this stage appear to be unverifiable. Delete both. -- saberwyn 11:24, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   —-- saberwyn 11:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both as albums by a non-notable (deleted) band. Incidentally, it is perfectly reasonable to bundle articles such as the above in this manner. 86.147.124.147 (talk) 12:37, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per simple common sense that when a band is deleted, the albums get deleted too. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD. Thus tagged. Also I agree with The Nom, these should be bundled.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 14:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD. Thus tagged. Also I agree with The Nom, these should be bundled.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 14:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.