Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Hina timeline


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 05:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Love Hina timeline

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - Wikipedia is not for plot summaries and it looks to be chock full of original research. Otto4711 12:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, because timelines are a useful way for putting events in context and television shows to have large audiences of Wikipedians, so this could be of interest to our readers. --164.107.222.23 16:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Usefulness isn't a very compelling reason to keep plot summary, esepcially if it's the whole content of an article as it is here. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 16:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * "This page is useful" is not a valid argument. Wikipedia is not a television guide. --Slowking Man 16:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Original research and plot summary do not belong on Wikipedia. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 16:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Original research, unencyclopedic. No cited sources, and appears to be little more than an in-universe listing of events. Such content would be more appropriate for a fan site. --Slowking Man 16:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 17:59, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into the main article Love Hina somehow. 132.205.44.5 01:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dilawar (t) 04:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge/redirect to main Love Hina article. - Ranma9617 02:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is original research based on interpretation from plot and only plot. Fails WP:NOR and WP:NOT by design. Jay32183 00:36, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Utterly useless for a general-purpose encyclopedia like Wikipedia, although it would be suitable for specialized anime wikis. - Sikon 06:04, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.